GOST vs expose
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GOST
Versatile secure tunneling and proxy toolkit
VS
expose
Beautiful, fully open-source tunnel to localhost
| Feature | GOST | expose |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | bare-metal, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,255 | ★ 4,567 |
| First released | 2017 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Chisel, ngrok | ngrok |
Why pick each one
Choose GOST if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.3k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose expose if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is GOST or expose better?
Neither is universally better. GOST has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are GOST and expose free and open-source?
Yes. GOST is licensed under MIT and expose under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GOST and expose with Docker?
GOST: yes. expose: yes.