GoSƐ vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGoSƐSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 33,952
First released20202015
ReplacesAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose GoSƐ if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
GoSƐ details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is GoSƐ or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while GoSƐ is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are GoSƐ and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. GoSƐ is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run GoSƐ and SeaweedFS with Docker?

GoSƐ: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons