Gogs vs Sourcebot
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted git hosting & forges options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Gogs | Sourcebot |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Git Hosting & Forges |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 47,724 | ★ 3,659 |
| First released | 2014 | 2024 |
| Replaces | GitHub, Bitbucket | GitHub Code Search, Sourcegraph |
Why pick each one
Choose Sourcebot if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.7k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Gogs or Sourcebot better?
Neither is universally better. Gogs has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Gogs and Sourcebot free and open-source?
Yes. Gogs is licensed under MIT and Sourcebot under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Gogs and Sourcebot with Docker?
Gogs: yes. Sourcebot: yes.