Gogs vs RhodeCode
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Gogs
Painless self-hosted Git service
VS
RhodeCode
Unified source code management for Git, SVN and Mercurial
| Feature | Gogs | RhodeCode |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 47,724 | ★ 800 |
| First released | 2014 | 2010 |
| Replaces | GitHub, Bitbucket | GitHub, Bitbucket |
Why pick each one
Choose RhodeCode if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Gogs or RhodeCode better?
Gogs is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider RhodeCode if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Gogs and RhodeCode free and open-source?
Yes. Gogs is licensed under MIT and RhodeCode under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Gogs and RhodeCode with Docker?
Gogs: yes. RhodeCode: yes.