Gogs vs Apache Allura
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted git hosting & forges options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Gogs
Painless self-hosted Git service
VS
Apache Allura
Open-source forge for managing source code and projects
| Feature | Gogs | Apache Allura |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Git Hosting & Forges |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 47,724 | ★ 148 |
| First released | 2014 | 2012 |
| Replaces | GitHub, Bitbucket | GitHub, SourceForge |
Why pick each one
Choose Apache Allura if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Gogs or Apache Allura better?
Gogs is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Apache Allura if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Gogs and Apache Allura free and open-source?
Yes. Gogs is licensed under MIT and Apache Allura under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Gogs and Apache Allura with Docker?
Gogs: yes. Apache Allura: yes.