gobookmarks vs Portainer CE
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted dashboards & startpages options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
gobookmarks
Landing page to display bookmarks stored in GitHub, GitLab or local
VS
Portainer CE
Lightweight management UI for Docker and Kubernetes
| Feature | gobookmarks | Portainer CE |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dashboards & Startpages | Dashboards & Startpages |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Zlib |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 17 | ★ 38,184 |
| First released | 2026 | 2016 |
| Replaces | — | Rancher, Docker Desktop |
Why pick each one
Choose gobookmarks if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is gobookmarks or Portainer CE better?
Portainer CE is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider gobookmarks if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are gobookmarks and Portainer CE free and open-source?
Yes. gobookmarks is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Portainer CE under Zlib. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run gobookmarks and Portainer CE with Docker?
gobookmarks: yes. Portainer CE: yes.