rmfakecloud vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturermfakecloudSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 1,304★ 33,952
First released20202015
ReplacesreMarkable CloudAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose rmfakecloud if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
rmfakecloud details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is rmfakecloud or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while rmfakecloud is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are rmfakecloud and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. rmfakecloud is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run rmfakecloud and SeaweedFS with Docker?

rmfakecloud: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons