rmfakecloud vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturermfakecloudPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 1,304★ 43,003
First released20202026
ReplacesreMarkable Cloud

Why pick each one

Choose rmfakecloud if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
rmfakecloud details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is rmfakecloud or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are rmfakecloud and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. rmfakecloud is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run rmfakecloud and Puter with Docker?

rmfakecloud: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons