Janssen Project vs ZITADEL
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Janssen Project
Cloud-native identity and access management platform
VS
ZITADEL
Cloud-native identity infrastructure with multi-tenancy built in
| Feature | Janssen Project | ZITADEL |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Java | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | kubernetes, helm | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 646 | ★ 14,671 |
| First released | 2020 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Okta, Auth0 | Auth0, Okta, Firebase Auth |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Janssen Project or ZITADEL better?
ZITADEL is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Janssen Project if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Janssen Project and ZITADEL free and open-source?
Yes. Janssen Project is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ZITADEL under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Janssen Project and ZITADEL with Docker?
Janssen Project: check the project docs for container support. ZITADEL: yes.