Janssen Project vs Supabase Auth
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Janssen Project
Cloud-native identity and access management platform
VS
Supabase Auth
Small JWT-based user authentication API service
| Feature | Janssen Project | Supabase Auth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | kubernetes, helm | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 646 | ★ 2,513 |
| First released | 2020 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Okta, Auth0 | Auth0 |
Why pick each one
Choose Supabase Auth if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Janssen Project or Supabase Auth better?
Supabase Auth is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Janssen Project if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Janssen Project and Supabase Auth free and open-source?
Yes. Janssen Project is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Supabase Auth under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Janssen Project and Supabase Auth with Docker?
Janssen Project: check the project docs for container support. Supabase Auth: yes.