Janssen Project vs Hanko
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Janssen Project
Cloud-native identity and access management platform
VS
Hanko
Passkey-first authentication for modern applications
| Feature | Janssen Project | Hanko |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | kubernetes, helm | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 646 | ★ 9,002 |
| First released | 2020 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Okta, Auth0 | Auth0, Clerk |
Why pick each one
Choose Hanko if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Janssen Project or Hanko better?
Hanko is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Janssen Project if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Janssen Project and Hanko free and open-source?
Yes. Janssen Project is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Hanko under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Janssen Project and Hanko with Docker?
Janssen Project: check the project docs for container support. Hanko: yes.