cgit vs SourceHut
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
cgit
Fast web interface for Git repositories
VS
SourceHut
The hacker's forge, 100% free and open source
| Feature | cgit | SourceHut |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools & Git | Git Hosting & Forges |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 800 | ★ 2,000 |
| First released | 2006 | 2018 |
| Replaces | GitHub | GitHub, GitLab |
Why pick each one
Choose cgit if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose SourceHut if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is cgit or SourceHut better?
Neither is universally better. SourceHut has the larger community, while cgit is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are cgit and SourceHut free and open-source?
Yes. cgit is licensed under GPL-2.0 and SourceHut under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run cgit and SourceHut with Docker?
cgit: check the project docs for container support. SourceHut: check the project docs for container support.