cgit vs RhodeCode
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
cgit
Fast web interface for Git repositories
VS
RhodeCode
Unified source code management for Git, SVN and Mercurial
| Feature | cgit | RhodeCode |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools & Git | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 800 | ★ 800 |
| First released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Replaces | GitHub | GitHub, Bitbucket |
Why pick each one
Choose cgit if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose RhodeCode if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is cgit or RhodeCode better?
cgit is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider RhodeCode if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are cgit and RhodeCode free and open-source?
Yes. cgit is licensed under GPL-2.0 and RhodeCode under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run cgit and RhodeCode with Docker?
cgit: check the project docs for container support. RhodeCode: yes.