cgit vs klaus
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | cgit | klaus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools & Git | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | GPL-2.0 | ISC |
| Language | C | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 800 | ★ 702 |
| First released | 2006 | 2011 |
| Replaces | GitHub | GitHub |
Why pick each one
Choose cgit if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose klaus if…
- Released under the ISC license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is cgit or klaus better?
Neither is universally better. cgit has the larger community, while klaus is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are cgit and klaus free and open-source?
Yes. cgit is licensed under GPL-2.0 and klaus under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run cgit and klaus with Docker?
cgit: check the project docs for container support. klaus: yes.