Soft Serve vs cgit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Soft Serve
Self-hostable Git server for the command line
VS
cgit
Fast web interface for Git repositories
| Feature | Soft Serve | cgit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | C |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,136 | ★ 800 |
| First released | 2021 | 2006 |
| Replaces | GitHub | GitHub |
Why pick each one
Choose Soft Serve if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.1k GitHub stars
Choose cgit if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Soft Serve or cgit better?
Soft Serve is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider cgit if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Soft Serve and cgit free and open-source?
Yes. Soft Serve is licensed under MIT and cgit under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Soft Serve and cgit with Docker?
Soft Serve: yes. cgit: check the project docs for container support.