Streamyfin vs qBittorrent

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureStreamyfinqBittorrent
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMPL-2.0GPL-3.0-or-later
LanguageTypeScriptC++
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB50 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcebare-metal
GitHub stars★ 5,097★ 39,327
First released20242023
ReplacesInfuse, Plex mobile appµTorrent

Why pick each one

Choose Streamyfin if…

  • Modern mobile UI
  • Active development
Streamyfin details

Choose qBittorrent if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
qBittorrent details

Frequently asked questions

Is Streamyfin or qBittorrent better?

Neither is universally better. qBittorrent has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Streamyfin and qBittorrent free and open-source?

Yes. Streamyfin is licensed under MPL-2.0 and qBittorrent under GPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Streamyfin and qBittorrent with Docker?

Streamyfin: check the project docs for container support. qBittorrent: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons