Garden vs Hoppscotch

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGardenHoppscotch
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMPL-2.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 3,604★ 79,994
First released20182019
ReplacesSkaffold, TiltPostman, Insomnia

Why pick each one

Choose Garden if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Garden details

Choose Hoppscotch if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
Hoppscotch details

Frequently asked questions

Is Garden or Hoppscotch better?

Hoppscotch is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Garden if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Garden and Hoppscotch free and open-source?

Yes. Garden is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Hoppscotch under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Garden and Hoppscotch with Docker?

Garden: check the project docs for container support. Hoppscotch: yes.

Related comparisons