Gajim vs Jangouts
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Gajim
Full-featured XMPP client with plugins
VS
Jangouts
Videoconferencing based on WebRTC and Janus Gateway with an UI
| Feature | Gajim | Jangouts |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Video Conferencing |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 600 | ★ 444 |
| First released | 2005 | 2025 |
| Replaces | Skype, Slack | Google Hangouts, Skype |
Why pick each one
Choose Gajim if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Jangouts if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Gajim or Jangouts better?
Gajim is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Jangouts if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Gajim and Jangouts free and open-source?
Yes. Gajim is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Jangouts under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Gajim and Jangouts with Docker?
Gajim: check the project docs for container support. Jangouts: check the project docs for container support.