Frigate Mobile Companion vs RPi Cam Web Interface
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Frigate Mobile Companion
Network video recorder front-end for review and clips
VS
RPi Cam Web Interface
Web-based control and streaming for the Raspberry Pi camera
| Feature | Frigate Mobile Companion | RPi Cam Web Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | HTML | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,150 | ★ 1,599 |
| First released | 2015 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Wowza | Nest Cam |
Why pick each one
Choose Frigate Mobile Companion if…
- Easy to publish camera feeds
- Polished interface
Frequently asked questions
Is Frigate Mobile Companion or RPi Cam Web Interface better?
Neither is universally better. Frigate Mobile Companion has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Frigate Mobile Companion and RPi Cam Web Interface free and open-source?
Yes. Frigate Mobile Companion is licensed under Apache-2.0 and RPi Cam Web Interface under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Frigate Mobile Companion and RPi Cam Web Interface with Docker?
Frigate Mobile Companion: yes. RPi Cam Web Interface: check the project docs for container support.
Related comparisons
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Agent DVR
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs WebRTC Camera
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs WebRTC Camera
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Ant Media Server Community Edition
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Bluecherry
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs camera-streamer
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Cameradar
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs Cameradar
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Camera.UI
- RPi Cam Web Interface vs Camera.UI