Sighthound Surveillance Station vs OpenALPR

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSighthound Surveillance StationOpenALPR
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonC++
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM1,024 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 276★ 11,440
First released20202015
ReplacesNest CamRekor Scout, Plate Recognizer

Why pick each one

Choose Sighthound Surveillance Station if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
Sighthound Surveillance Station details

Choose OpenALPR if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 11.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
OpenALPR details

Frequently asked questions

Is Sighthound Surveillance Station or OpenALPR better?

Neither is universally better. OpenALPR has the larger community, while Sighthound Surveillance Station is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Sighthound Surveillance Station and OpenALPR free and open-source?

Yes. Sighthound Surveillance Station is licensed under MIT and OpenALPR under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Sighthound Surveillance Station and OpenALPR with Docker?

Sighthound Surveillance Station: yes. OpenALPR: yes.

Related comparisons