FreshRSS vs rss2hook
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FreshRSS
Free, self-hostable RSS feed aggregator
VS
rss2hook
Lightweight personal RSS aggregator and reader
| Feature | FreshRSS | rss2hook |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,716 | ★ 39 |
| First released | 2013 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Inoreader, Google Reader | Zapier, IFTTT |
Why pick each one
Choose FreshRSS if…
- Lightweight and fast
- Works with many mobile apps
- Actively maintained
Choose rss2hook if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is FreshRSS or rss2hook better?
Neither is universally better. FreshRSS has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are FreshRSS and rss2hook free and open-source?
Yes. FreshRSS is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and rss2hook under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FreshRSS and rss2hook with Docker?
FreshRSS: yes. rss2hook: check the project docs for container support.