Franklin vs Pelican
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Franklin
Static site generator written in Julia
VS
Pelican
Static site generator for Python and Markdown lovers
| Feature | Franklin | Pelican |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Julia | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | source, binary | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,063 | ★ 13,331 |
| First released | 2019 | 2010 |
| Replaces | Jekyll, Hugo | WordPress, Blogger |
Why pick each one
Choose Franklin if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (1.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Julia
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Franklin or Pelican better?
Neither is universally better. Pelican has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Franklin and Pelican free and open-source?
Yes. Franklin is licensed under MIT and Pelican under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Franklin and Pelican with Docker?
Franklin: check the project docs for container support. Pelican: check the project docs for container support.