Framadate vs ETAR
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Framadate
Online polling and meeting scheduling tool
VS
ETAR
Open-source calendar server companion for events
| Feature | Framadate | ETAR |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Calendar & Contacts | Calendar & Contacts |
| License | CECILL-B | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 600 | ★ 2,565 |
| First released | 2011 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Doodle | Google Calendar |
Why pick each one
Choose Framadate if…
- Released under the CECILL-B license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is Framadate or ETAR better?
Neither is universally better. ETAR has the larger community, while Framadate is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Framadate and ETAR free and open-source?
Yes. Framadate is licensed under CECILL-B and ETAR under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Framadate and ETAR with Docker?
Framadate: yes. ETAR: yes.