Fluentd vs VictoriaMetrics
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Fluentd
Unified logging layer for collecting and routing data
VS
VictoriaMetrics
Fast, cost-effective time series database and monitoring solution
| Feature | Fluentd | VictoriaMetrics |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Ruby | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,576 | ★ 17,488 |
| First released | 2011 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Logstash | Datadog, Grafana Cloud |
Why pick each one
Choose VictoriaMetrics if…
- Excellent compression and speed
- Easy single-binary deployment
Frequently asked questions
Is Fluentd or VictoriaMetrics better?
Neither is universally better. VictoriaMetrics has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Fluentd and VictoriaMetrics free and open-source?
Yes. Fluentd is licensed under Apache-2.0 and VictoriaMetrics under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Fluentd and VictoriaMetrics with Docker?
Fluentd: yes. VictoriaMetrics: yes.