Fluent Bit vs Grafana Loki

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFluent BitGrafana Loki
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageCGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM32 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 8,020★ 28,687
First released20152018
ReplacesLogstashSplunk, Datadog Logs

Why pick each one

Choose Fluent Bit if…

  • Ideal for containers and edge
  • Extremely efficient
Fluent Bit details

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Frequently asked questions

Is Fluent Bit or Grafana Loki better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Fluent Bit and Grafana Loki free and open-source?

Yes. Fluent Bit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Grafana Loki under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Fluent Bit and Grafana Loki with Docker?

Fluent Bit: yes. Grafana Loki: yes.

Related comparisons