Flood vs qBittorrent

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFloodqBittorrent
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0-or-laterGPL-3.0-or-later
LanguageTypeScriptC++
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM100 MB50 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 2,818★ 39,327
First released20232023
ReplacesµTorrent

Why pick each one

Choose Flood if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Flood details

Choose qBittorrent if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
qBittorrent details

Frequently asked questions

Is Flood or qBittorrent better?

Neither is universally better. qBittorrent has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Flood and qBittorrent free and open-source?

Yes. Flood is licensed under GPL-3.0-or-later and qBittorrent under GPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Flood and qBittorrent with Docker?

Flood: check the project docs for container support. qBittorrent: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons