Flood vs PeerTube

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFloodPeerTube
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0-or-laterAGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM100 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 2,818★ 15,236
First released20232018
ReplacesYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose Flood if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Flood details

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Frequently asked questions

Is Flood or PeerTube better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while Flood is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Flood and PeerTube free and open-source?

Yes. Flood is licensed under GPL-3.0-or-later and PeerTube under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Flood and PeerTube with Docker?

Flood: check the project docs for container support. PeerTube: yes.

Related comparisons