FlightGear vs OpenRCT2

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFlightGearOpenRCT2
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseGPL-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageC++C++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcebare-metal, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 788★ 16,049
First released19972014
ReplacesMicrosoft Flight Simulator, X-PlaneRollerCoaster Tycoon

Why pick each one

Choose FlightGear if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Written in C++
FlightGear details

Choose OpenRCT2 if…

  • Faithful modern remake
  • Active community
OpenRCT2 details

Frequently asked questions

Is FlightGear or OpenRCT2 better?

Neither is universally better. OpenRCT2 has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are FlightGear and OpenRCT2 free and open-source?

Yes. FlightGear is licensed under GPL-2.0 and OpenRCT2 under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FlightGear and OpenRCT2 with Docker?

FlightGear: check the project docs for container support. OpenRCT2: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons