Flagsmith vs Umami
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Flagsmith
Open-source feature flag and remote config service
VS
Umami
Simple, fast, privacy-focused web analytics
| Feature | Flagsmith | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,505 | ★ 38,103 |
| First released | 2018 | 2020 |
| Replaces | LaunchDarkly | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Choose Flagsmith if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 6.5k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Flagsmith or Umami better?
Umami is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Flagsmith if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Flagsmith and Umami free and open-source?
Yes. Flagsmith is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Umami under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Flagsmith and Umami with Docker?
Flagsmith: yes. Umami: yes.