Nextcloud Desktop Sync vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNextcloud Desktop SyncPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageC++TypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker
GitHub stars★ 3,812★ 43,003
First released20162026
ReplacesDropbox, OneDrive

Why pick each one

Choose Nextcloud Desktop Sync if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
Nextcloud Desktop Sync details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Nextcloud Desktop Sync or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while Nextcloud Desktop Sync is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Nextcloud Desktop Sync and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. Nextcloud Desktop Sync is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Nextcloud Desktop Sync and Puter with Docker?

Nextcloud Desktop Sync: check the project docs for container support. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons