FileRun vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFileRunPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
License⊘ ProprietaryAGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 43,003
First released20202026
Replaces

Why pick each one

Choose FileRun if…

  • Released under the ⊘ Proprietary license
  • Written in PHP
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
FileRun details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is FileRun or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are FileRun and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. FileRun is licensed under ⊘ Proprietary and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FileRun and Puter with Docker?

FileRun: check the project docs for container support. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons