File Browser vs Magic Wormhole

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserMagic Wormhole
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB32 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 22,792
First released20172016
ReplacesDropboxWeTransfer, AirDrop

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Magic Wormhole if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 22.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
Magic Wormhole details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Magic Wormhole better?

Neither is universally better. File Browser has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are File Browser and Magic Wormhole free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Magic Wormhole under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Magic Wormhole with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Magic Wormhole: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons