Feng Office vs Twake Drive
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted groupware options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Feng Office
Web-based collaboration and project management suite
VS
Twake Drive
Open-source collaborative file storage and workspace
| Feature | Feng Office | Twake Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Groupware | Groupware |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 106 | ★ 980 |
| First released | 2007 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Basecamp, Microsoft Project | Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive |
Why pick each one
Choose Twake Drive if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Feng Office or Twake Drive better?
Neither is universally better. Twake Drive has the larger community, while Feng Office is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Feng Office and Twake Drive free and open-source?
Yes. Feng Office is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Twake Drive under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Feng Office and Twake Drive with Docker?
Feng Office: check the project docs for container support. Twake Drive: yes.