Feeds Fun vs yarr
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Feeds Fun | yarr |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 384 | ★ 3,919 |
| First released | 2020 | 2020 |
| Replaces | — | Feedly, Google Reader |
Why pick each one
Choose Feeds Fun if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Feeds Fun or yarr better?
yarr is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Feeds Fun if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Feeds Fun and yarr free and open-source?
Yes. Feeds Fun is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and yarr under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Feeds Fun and yarr with Docker?
Feeds Fun: check the project docs for container support. yarr: yes.