Feeds Fun vs Winds

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFeeds FunWinds
CategoryRSS & News ReadersRSS & News Readers
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseMIT
LanguagePythonJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 384★ 9,115
First released20202017
ReplacesFeedly

Why pick each one

Choose Feeds Fun if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Feeds Fun details

Choose Winds if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 9.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
Winds details

Frequently asked questions

Is Feeds Fun or Winds better?

Neither is universally better. Winds has the larger community, while Feeds Fun is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Feeds Fun and Winds free and open-source?

Yes. Feeds Fun is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Winds under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Feeds Fun and Winds with Docker?

Feeds Fun: check the project docs for container support. Winds: yes.

Related comparisons