FeedReader vs RSSHub
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FeedReader
Modern desktop RSS client for Linux
VS
RSSHub
Generate RSS feeds for sites that lack them
| Feature | FeedReader | RSSHub |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Vala | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 767 | ★ 45,646 |
| First released | 2014 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Feedly | Feedly |
Why pick each one
Choose FeedReader if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Vala
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is FeedReader or RSSHub better?
Neither is universally better. RSSHub has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are FeedReader and RSSHub free and open-source?
Yes. FeedReader is licensed under GPL-3.0 and RSSHub under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FeedReader and RSSHub with Docker?
FeedReader: check the project docs for container support. RSSHub: yes.