FeedCord vs yarr

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFeedCordyarr
CategoryRSS & News ReadersRSS & News Readers
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageC#Go
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 317★ 3,919
First released20252020
ReplacesFeedly, Google Reader

Why pick each one

Choose FeedCord if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in C#
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
FeedCord details

Choose yarr if…

  • Extremely simple to run
  • Tiny footprint
  • No dependencies
yarr details

Frequently asked questions

Is FeedCord or yarr better?

yarr is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider FeedCord if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are FeedCord and yarr free and open-source?

Yes. FeedCord is licensed under MIT and yarr under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FeedCord and yarr with Docker?

FeedCord: yes. yarr: yes.

Related comparisons