SHSelfHostIndex

Fedora Commons Repository vs Stirling PDF

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FE Fedora Commons Repository Robust and modular repository system for the management and VS ST Stirling PDF Powerful locally hosted web-based PDF toolkit
FeatureFedora Commons RepositoryStirling PDF
CategoryDocument ManagementDocument Management
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageJavaJava
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 253★ 89,077
First released20262023
Replaces—Adobe Acrobat, Smallpdf

Why pick each one

Choose Fedora Commons Repository if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Written in Java
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Fedora Commons Repository details

Choose Stirling PDF if…

  • Keeps documents private
  • Huge range of features
Stirling PDF details

Frequently asked questions

Is Fedora Commons Repository or Stirling PDF better?

Stirling PDF is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Fedora Commons Repository if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Fedora Commons Repository and Stirling PDF free and open-source?

Yes. Fedora Commons Repository is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Stirling PDF under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Fedora Commons Repository and Stirling PDF with Docker?

Fedora Commons Repository: check the project docs for container support. Stirling PDF: yes.

Related comparisons