Cashew Self-Host vs HyperSwitch

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted budgeting & finance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCashew Self-HostHyperSwitch
CategoryBudgeting & FinanceBudgeting & Finance
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageDartRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 4,533★ 43,417
First released20222026
ReplacesYNAB, Mint

Why pick each one

Choose Cashew Self-Host if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.5k GitHub stars)
Cashew Self-Host details

Choose HyperSwitch if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
HyperSwitch details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cashew Self-Host or HyperSwitch better?

Neither is universally better. HyperSwitch has the larger community, while Cashew Self-Host is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Cashew Self-Host and HyperSwitch free and open-source?

Yes. Cashew Self-Host is licensed under MIT and HyperSwitch under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cashew Self-Host and HyperSwitch with Docker?

Cashew Self-Host: yes. HyperSwitch: yes.

Related comparisons