ExpenseOwl vs Lago

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted budgeting & finance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureExpenseOwlLago
CategoryBudgeting & FinanceBudgeting & Finance
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageHTMLGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM64 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, sourcedocker, kubernetes, source
GitHub stars★ 1,475★ 10,308
First released20242022
ReplacesMint, SpendeeStripe Billing, Chargebee

Why pick each one

Choose ExpenseOwl if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Fast and simple
ExpenseOwl details

Choose Lago if…

  • Powerful for SaaS billing
  • Developer-friendly
Lago details

Frequently asked questions

Is ExpenseOwl or Lago better?

Neither is universally better. Lago has the larger community, while ExpenseOwl is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are ExpenseOwl and Lago free and open-source?

Yes. ExpenseOwl is licensed under MIT and Lago under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ExpenseOwl and Lago with Docker?

ExpenseOwl: yes. Lago: yes.

Related comparisons