edu-sharing vs Open edX

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted learning & courses options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featureedu-sharingOpen edX
CategoryLearning & CoursesLearning & Courses
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaPython
Setup difficultyHardHard
Min. RAM4,096 MB8,192 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 30★ 8,156
First released20122013
ReplacesCanvas CommonsCoursera, Canvas

Why pick each one

Choose edu-sharing if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Java
edu-sharing details

Choose Open edX if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 8.2k GitHub stars
Open edX details

Frequently asked questions

Is edu-sharing or Open edX better?

Neither is universally better. Open edX has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are edu-sharing and Open edX free and open-source?

Yes. edu-sharing is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Open edX under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run edu-sharing and Open edX with Docker?

edu-sharing: yes. Open edX: yes.

Related comparisons