edu-sharing vs OpenBoard Interactive
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted learning & courses options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
edu-sharing
Open-source repository for educational resources
VS
OpenBoard Interactive
Interactive whiteboard software for teaching
| Feature | edu-sharing | OpenBoard Interactive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Learning & Courses | Learning & Courses |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 30 | ★ 3,020 |
| First released | 2012 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Canvas Commons | SMART Notebook, Promethean |
Why pick each one
Choose edu-sharing if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Java
Choose OpenBoard Interactive if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (3k GitHub stars)
- Written in C++
Frequently asked questions
Is edu-sharing or OpenBoard Interactive better?
OpenBoard Interactive is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider edu-sharing if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are edu-sharing and OpenBoard Interactive free and open-source?
Yes. edu-sharing is licensed under GPL-3.0 and OpenBoard Interactive under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run edu-sharing and OpenBoard Interactive with Docker?
edu-sharing: yes. OpenBoard Interactive: check the project docs for container support.