EteSync vs Meeting scheduler nono Booked

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEteSyncMeeting scheduler nono Booked
CategoryCalendar & ContactsCalendar & Contacts
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguagePythonPHP
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal, docker
GitHub stars★ 1,765★ 779
First released20172011
ReplacesGoogle Calendar, iCloudSkedda, Acuity Scheduling

Why pick each one

Choose EteSync if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
EteSync details

Choose Meeting scheduler nono Booked if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Meeting scheduler nono Booked details

Frequently asked questions

Is EteSync or Meeting scheduler nono Booked better?

Neither is universally better. EteSync has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are EteSync and Meeting scheduler nono Booked free and open-source?

Yes. EteSync is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Meeting scheduler nono Booked under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run EteSync and Meeting scheduler nono Booked with Docker?

EteSync: yes. Meeting scheduler nono Booked: yes.

Related comparisons