WLED vs OpenSprinkler
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
WLED
Firmware for controlling addressable LED strips
VS
OpenSprinkler
Open-source internet-connected irrigation controller
| Feature | WLED | OpenSprinkler |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C++ | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 16 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 18,518 | ★ 553 |
| First released | 2016 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Philips Hue | Rachio |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is WLED or OpenSprinkler better?
WLED is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OpenSprinkler if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are WLED and OpenSprinkler free and open-source?
Yes. WLED is licensed under MIT and OpenSprinkler under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run WLED and OpenSprinkler with Docker?
WLED: check the project docs for container support. OpenSprinkler: check the project docs for container support.