WLED vs OpenRemote
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
WLED
Firmware for controlling addressable LED strips
VS
OpenRemote
IoT Asset management, Flow Rules and WHEN-THEN rules, Data
| Feature | WLED | OpenRemote |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C++ | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 16 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 18,518 | ★ 1,835 |
| First released | 2016 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Philips Hue | — |
Why pick each one
Choose OpenRemote if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Java
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is WLED or OpenRemote better?
WLED is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OpenRemote if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are WLED and OpenRemote free and open-source?
Yes. WLED is licensed under MIT and OpenRemote under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run WLED and OpenRemote with Docker?
WLED: check the project docs for container support. OpenRemote: check the project docs for container support.