WLED vs OpenEnergyMonitor Emoncms
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
WLED
Firmware for controlling addressable LED strips
VS
OpenEnergyMonitor Emoncms
Web app for processing, logging, and visualizing energy data
| Feature | WLED | OpenEnergyMonitor Emoncms |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C++ | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 16 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 18,518 | ★ 1,319 |
| First released | 2016 | 2011 |
| Replaces | Philips Hue | Sense |
Why pick each one
Choose OpenEnergyMonitor Emoncms if…
- Mature energy platform
- Flexible visualizations
Frequently asked questions
Is WLED or OpenEnergyMonitor Emoncms better?
WLED is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OpenEnergyMonitor Emoncms if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are WLED and OpenEnergyMonitor Emoncms free and open-source?
Yes. WLED is licensed under MIT and OpenEnergyMonitor Emoncms under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run WLED and OpenEnergyMonitor Emoncms with Docker?
WLED: check the project docs for container support. OpenEnergyMonitor Emoncms: yes.