Ergo vs MiroTalk
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Ergo
Modern IRC server with IRCv3 and bouncer features
VS
MiroTalk
Free WebRTC video conferencing and meeting rooms
| Feature | Ergo | MiroTalk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,288 | ★ 4,667 |
| First released | 2016 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Slack, Discord | Zoom, Google Meet |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Ergo or MiroTalk better?
MiroTalk is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Ergo if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Ergo and MiroTalk free and open-source?
Yes. Ergo is licensed under MIT and MiroTalk under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ergo and MiroTalk with Docker?
Ergo: yes. MiroTalk: yes.