EMQX vs deCONZ

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEMQXdeCONZ
CategoryHome AutomationHome Automation
LicenseApache-2.0BSD-3-Clause
LanguageErlangC++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 16,599★ 1,910
First released20262017
ReplacesPhilips Hue Bridge

Why pick each one

Choose EMQX if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 16.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in Erlang
EMQX details

Choose deCONZ if…

  • Visual mesh management
  • Stable Zigbee stack
deCONZ details

Frequently asked questions

Is EMQX or deCONZ better?

Neither is universally better. EMQX has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are EMQX and deCONZ free and open-source?

Yes. EMQX is licensed under Apache-2.0 and deCONZ under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run EMQX and deCONZ with Docker?

EMQX: yes. deCONZ: yes.

Related comparisons