EMQX vs Wyoming Satellite
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | EMQX | Wyoming Satellite |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Erlang | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 16,599 | ★ 1,243 |
| First released | 2026 | 2023 |
| Replaces | — | Amazon Echo, Google Nest |
Why pick each one
Choose EMQX if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 16.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Erlang
Frequently asked questions
Is EMQX or Wyoming Satellite better?
Neither is universally better. EMQX has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are EMQX and Wyoming Satellite free and open-source?
Yes. EMQX is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Wyoming Satellite under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run EMQX and Wyoming Satellite with Docker?
EMQX: yes. Wyoming Satellite: check the project docs for container support.