EMQX vs openWakeWord

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEMQXopenWakeWord
CategoryHome AutomationHome Automation
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageErlangJupyter Notebook
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, source
GitHub stars★ 16,599★ 2,637
First released20262023
ReplacesPicovoice

Why pick each one

Choose EMQX if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 16.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in Erlang
EMQX details

Choose openWakeWord if…

  • Fully offline
  • Lightweight
openWakeWord details

Frequently asked questions

Is EMQX or openWakeWord better?

Neither is universally better. EMQX has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are EMQX and openWakeWord free and open-source?

Yes. EMQX is licensed under Apache-2.0 and openWakeWord under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run EMQX and openWakeWord with Docker?

EMQX: yes. openWakeWord: yes.

Related comparisons